Tag Archives: HOUSE OF LEAVES

#231: ARCHITECTURE AS VILLAIN

October 9, 2026

(photo from Backrooms, A24)

(photo from Backrooms, A24)

The platitudes are easy: Architecture brings people together; architecture builds communities; architecture uplifts the human spirit; etc. But the 2026 film Backrooms offers a counterpoint: Architecture terrorizes people; architecture holds you hostage; architecture is horror.

Through stage set design, backdrops, and art direction, a film’s production designer is the architect crafting the visual environment of the story. In rare cases, the architecture is such a part of the story that it becomes one of the main characters, as in 2024’s The Brutalist or 1982’s Blade Runner.

But in Backrooms—a psychological horror movie directed by first-timer, 21-year-old Kane Parsons—the architecture is not just a character within the narrative, but the narrative itself.

Within the basement of a furniture store, the owner discovers a world of boundless office-like spaces: yellow wallpapered rooms upon rooms, hallways upon hallways; infinite ceiling gird of fluorescent lights buzzing one to madness; a musty carpeted atmosphere with no beginning and no end punctuated only by unexpected clusters of furniture or bizarre half furniture. Within this damp frightening satire of the American corporate environment, architecture is an ominous threat, a hostile actor.

(photo from Backrooms, A24)
(photo from Backrooms, A24)

This counterpoint of architecture-to-be-feared is argued through isolation, despair, and violence. Compare this to the architecture of a home where a family grows together. Or the architecture of a school where students learn and socialize. Or the architecture of restaurants where diners gather in communion. Or the architecture of a church where congregation members worship and celebrate.

upper left: Colby Residence, Los Angeles, California (photo by Hunter Kerhart); upper right: STEM Makerspace, Berkeley Hall School, Los Angeles, California (photo by Bradley Wheeler); lower left: Din Tai Fung Restaurant, The Americana at Brand, Glendale, California (photo by Gregg Segal); lower right: 14th Shamarpa Reliquary Building, Natural Bridge, Virginia (photo my Mark Ballogg), all by Poon Design

Within Backrooms, its architecture accomplishes none of these noble virtues, and in turn, is a place of allegorical trauma and bad memories where one hopes to escape. The claustrophobia unleashed upon both the characters and the audience reminds me of Martin Scorsese’s, neo-noir After Hours, 1985. Within, the lead character desperately tries to escape the Soho neighborhood (and architecture) of New York City, portrayed as a surreal and frightening world of paranoia.

A question to ask: Was the architecture of Backrooms created digitally or in reality? To amplify the filmmaker’s ambitions and the architectural panic and dread, this mysterious basement was physically built, 30,000 square feet of creepy liminal spaces set over four soundstages. Meaning, the villainous architecture is real—so real that the lead actor was once lost within the stage set.

(photo from Backrooms, A24)

Though no explicit references has been made by the film’s studio, A24 (Backrooms is its highest grossing film), I see common ground with Mark Z. Danielewski’s 2000 novel, House of Leaves, about “a house that’s larger on the inside then on the outside.” Similarly, architecture is a malevolent threat.

Caltrans District 7 Headquarters, Los Angeles, California, by Thom Mayne, Morphosis (photo by Liao Yusheng)

Architecture is not often discussed as unsettling. Ideas like beauty, harmony, and function often establish the baseline. But some disagree. Pritzker-honored architect Thom Mayne of Morphosis promotes an uncompromising philosophy, often suggesting that architecture should confront the world, not just chase aesthetics. Calling his work “rough architecture,” Mayne’s projects are aggressive and complex. His words: “difficult” and “rootless.”

Architecture does not need to be pleasing and well-being. In some cases, it might need to disturb, alarm, even horrify. As architectural historian and educator Spiro Kostof once suggested, “to challenge our intellectual complacency.”

To open our eyes. To keep us on our toes.

(photo from Backrooms, A24)

#206: HOUSE OF LEAVES | AN ARCHITECTURAL READING

May 23, 2025

It’s not something I usually do—review a book, that is. Critically speaking, I wouldn’t call this a book review. It is more of an architectural observation. Reading and experiencing Mark Z. Danielewski’s 2000 debut novel, House of Leaves, is an encounter through space and time. Yes, a physical phenomenon—much more than simply turning pages.

House of Leaves, pages 144-145

Of this bestseller translated into numerous languages, Amazon states, “The mind-bending cult classic about a house that’s larger on the inside then on the outside. A masterpiece of horror and an astonishingly immersive, maze-like reading experience that redefines the boundaries of a novel.”

House of Leaves, pages 336-367

House of Leaves is difficult to summarize. More than a tale within a tale, it is a fictional story:

  • about a man, Johnny Truant,
  • who is reading an academic critique by a dead man named Zampano,
  • about an autobiographical documentary film, The Navidson Record, about a haunted house,
  • created by photojournalist, Will Navidson.

Sure, the fact that this book is about a house makes it inherently architectural, but the story explores many themes in the design lexicon, e.g., labyrinth, Piranesian space, Escher’s loops, size and scale, signifier/signified, palimpsest, material sampling, chiaroscuro, compression and contrast, zeitgeist, mazes, and so on.

House of Leaves, page 627

But it is the book’s graphic design that will confront the reader initially, starting simply with the word “house,” always printed in bright blue. The book’s design evolves from there with text in red but then crossed out, diverse fonts, a standard page of text vs. only one word per page, illegible paragraphs, upside down words, even music notation and Braille in graphic form. Several pages require the reader to turn the book in a spiraling pattern to read the words.

House of Leaves, pages 288-289

These graphic elements may appear at first indulgent, but they challenge the norms of book publishing and printing, testing the gravity of what we expect. Disorienting the reader, the presentation intensifies the terror of the story about inhabitants disappearing within the walls of a seemingly innocent small house. Within this home, hallways are miles long, a staircase descends forever, walking across a mere room can take days, and darkness is shiveringly cold. Yet on the exterior, the house is a conventional house. For example, page 122 reads, “It is not surprising then that when Holloway’s team finally begins the long trek back, they discover that the staircase is much farther away than they had anticipated, as if in their absence the distances had stretched.”

The tale is replete with footnotes, citations, interviews, and exhibits, all appearing rigorous and real (Stephen King, Jacques Derrida, Anne Rice, Stanley Kubrick, Hunter Thompson), but actually fictional. With the house suggested to be older than the Earth, I am enveloped, confronted even, with matters of risks, life and death, husband/wife love, family and children, obsession, ambition, fantasies and lastly, paranoia.

House of Leaves, pages 374-375
© Poon Design Inc.